论文部分内容阅读
不仅社会科学研究涉及到社会和学术的关系问题 ,就是历史学研究也难逃“话语”和“权力”的分析框架。中国穆斯林史和回族史研究的统合与分离 ,则部分地表明了这一点。李普曼教授有关中国穆斯林史的研究并没有认同国内学者对穆斯林史和回族史所做的分野 ,他致力于陈述一部自然人群的历史陈述 ,而不是权力 /话语体系下构建的“回族史”。即使是对西北“穆斯林”的整体性历史考察 ,他也摒弃了“穆斯林”这样的传统集体词汇 ,从更为具体的“穆斯林”社会生活的细枝末节分析西北穆斯林的独特社会经历。这就是李普曼研究西北穆斯林史时所用的场景分析。对西北穆斯林史的场景分析 ,从宏观的方面讲 ,涉及到西北社会的地理和人文环境 ;从微观的方面讲 ,则涉及到“穆斯林”团体、个体之间的利益纠葛及其互动关系。对西北穆斯林史的场景分析 ,不仅有助于祛除集体名词对西北穆斯林史的不当描述 ,而且有助于阐明穆斯林在中国形成陌生人的原因。
Not only does social science research involve the relationship between society and academia, it also means that historical studies can not escape the analytical framework of “discourse” and “power.” The integration and separation of the studies on the history of Muslims and the history of the Hui in China partially show this point. Professor Lipman’s research on the history of Muslims in China did not agree with the domestic scholars’ distinction between Muslim and Hui history. He devoted himself to presenting the historical statements of a natural person rather than the “Hui history” built under the power / discourse system “. Even a holistic historical investigation of Muslims in the northwest, he abandoned the traditional collective vocabulary of ”Muslims“ and analyzed the unique social experiences of Muslims in northwestern China from the more detailed ”Muslim" social life. This is the scene analysis used by Lippmann when studying the history of Northwestern Muslims. The analysis of the scene of the Muslim history in Northwest China from the macroscopic point of view involves the geographical and humanistic environment of the Northwest society. From a microscopic point of view, it involves the entanglement of interests among Muslim groups and their interactions with each other. The analysis of the scenes of Muslim history in northwestern China not only helps to dispel the improper description of the collective history of northwest Muslims by collective nouns, but also helps to clarify why Muslims form strangers in China.