论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察PDCA循环模式用于改善临床检验质量控制的有效性。方法:对我院检验科样本不提供PDCA循环(对照组),同期检验科样本提供PDCA循环(观察组),比较两组检验样本中健康体检、门诊及住院患者的检验合格率,分析其质量控制情况。结果:经比较,观察组通过提供PDCA循环,检验标本检出的不合格例数明显少于对照组;门诊、住院及健康体检标本上,不合格份数占比分别为0.26%、0.29%和0.21%,对照组未提供PDCA循环,其不合格例数相对更多,门诊、住院及健康体检标本上,不合格率依次为1.07%、1.45%和1.00%;两组相比,观察组不合格率显著下降,有统计学差异(均P<0.05)。结论:在医院临床检验过程中提供PDCA循环模式,有助于规范临床检验程序,提高检验样本的合格率,从而有效控制检验质量。
Objective: To observe the effectiveness of PDCA cycle model in improving the quality control of clinical tests. Methods: PDCA circulation was not provided to the laboratory samples of our hospital (control group), while PDCA cycles (observation group) were provided for the samples of the same period, and the pass rate of health check-ups, outpatients and inpatients in the two test samples was compared to analyze the quality Control the situation. Results: Compared with the control group, the number of unqualified cases in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group by providing PDCA circulation. The proportion of unqualified cases in the outpatient, inpatient and health examination specimens was 0.26%, 0.29% and 0.21%, the control group did not provide PDCA cycle, the number of cases of failure is relatively more, outpatient, hospital and health examination specimens, the failure rates were 1.07%, 1.45% and 1.00%; two groups compared to the observation group is not Pass rate decreased significantly, with statistical differences (all P <0.05). CONCLUSION: The PDCA cycle model is provided during the clinical examination of hospitals, which helps to standardize clinical testing procedures and improve the passing rate of test samples so as to effectively control the quality of testing.