论文部分内容阅读
一、引言“事实上的法律问题是很难根据抽象体系及术语相吻合的,实际问题是混乱无章、复杂且不可区分的,远超乎法典的体系。”1而类型化思维能够从某种程度上弥补其不足,有助于实现民法典体系化形式上和逻辑上的一致性。可见,类型化思维在法学上有其独特的地位和价值,然而目前学术界在这一方面的研究并没有引起足够重视,而类型化思维在语言学、逻辑学等方面发挥着重要的功能。由此,笔者认为我
I. INTRODUCTION “De facto legal issues are difficult to reconcile with abstract systems and terminology, and the real problems are chaotic, complex and indivisible systems that are far beyond the canon of law.” 1 And typological thinking can To some extent, to make up for its deficiencies, contribute to the formalization of the formal Code of Civil Code formal and logical consistency. It can be seen that the typological thinking has its unique position and value in jurisprudence. However, academic research in this field has not given enough attention. Typological thinking plays an important role in linguistics and logic. As a result, I think that I