债权乃相对权,债之相对性原则亦是债法中的基石,债法中的各项制度皆由此展开,同时亦是债权区别于物权等绝对权的一个重要特征。然而随着各种债之绝对性理论的相继出现,使这一基本原则受到了威胁。那么这些看似突破的现象究其本质到底是否与相对性原则相违背?本文欲从现象出发,来探究相对性与绝对性的本质,进而对上述问题予以回应。 Obligations are relative rights, and the principle of relativity of debts is also the cornerstone of the law of debts. All the systems in the law of debts are thus started, and at the same time, they are also an important feature of distinguishing claims from absolute rights such as real rights. However, with the advent of the absolute theory of various debts, this fundamental principle has been threatened. So these seemingly breakthrough phenomenon in essence whether the nature of the principle of relativity contrary? This article from the phenomenon, to explore the nature of relativity and absolute, and then respond to the above questions.