人类学对于文化传播的研究有其成熟的一套研究方法。由其发端之始,便有以泰勒(E.B.Tylor)等一批学者开始对文化传播机制进行讨论,之后更是出现了一个关于文化传播的人类学理论流派。[1]费孝通接受了文化传播学派和文化功能学派的双重影响,为其后来的中华民族多元一体学说打下了理论基础。1982年,费先生又对“历史形成的民族地区”中的“走廊地区”作了特别论述:“上述几个复杂地区:一条西北走廊,一条藏彝走廊,一条南岭走廊。”1确定了南岭走廊作为中华民族多元一体格局中南北文化交流的重要通道之一的地位。这样一来,对于在此走廊内生息的客家族群建构与文化传播的研究就显得举足轻重了。同时, Anthropology for the study of cultural transmission has its own set of research methods. Starting from its origins, there have been a number of scholars such as Taylor began to discuss the mechanism of cultural transmission, followed by the emergence of an anthropological theory of cultural transmission genre. Fei Xiaotong accepted the dual influence of the school of cultural communication and the school of cultural functionalism, laying a theoretical foundation for its subsequent multi-unitary theory of Chinese nation. In 1982, Mr. Fei made special remarks on the “corridor area” in the “ethnic areas of historical formation”: “The above several complicated areas: a northwestern corridor, a Tibetan corridor and a south ridge corridor ”1" identified the status of Nanling Corridor as one of the most important channels for cultural exchanges between China, South Korea and China in the multi-dimensional integration of the Chinese nation. In this way, the research on the construction and cultural transmission of the Hakka communities that have lived in this corridor has become very important. Simultaneously,