论文部分内容阅读
现在有很多人认为,美国联邦机构的开门政策,即不管是否需要,土地所有者获得土壤保持基金补贴的机会均等,结果造成水土保持计划无甚成效。1975年到1978年期间,由政府资助的在田地上进行的大约50％的土壤保持措施只达到“可容忍的”土壤保持标准。这一事实导致人们要求更进一步明确水土保持基金的使用目标,在很多场合下应对土地利用和经营管理实行强制性控制。
Now many people think that the U.S. federal government’s door-opening policy that equal or no equal opportunity for landowners to obtain subsidies from the Soil Conservation Fund results in less effective soil and water conservation plans. Between 1975 and 1978, about 50% of the soil conservation measures carried out by the government on the fields reached only the “tolerable” soil conservation standards. This fact has caused people to request further clarification on the use target of the Soil and Water Conservation Fund and on many occasions they should exercise mandatory control over land use and management.