论文部分内容阅读
目的分析不同固定方式在锁骨骨折患者中的应用效果.方法将200例锁骨骨折患者分为四组,各50例,A组行重建钢板内固定,B组行克氏针钢丝内固定,C组行锁骨钩钢板内固定,D组行螺钉经锁骨与喙突固定.结果 A组、B组、C组、D组患者的优良率分别为94%、92%、96%、100%,比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);A组、B组、C组、D组患者的不良反应率分别为0%、16%、8%、4%,比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05).结论四种内固定方式治疗锁骨骨折的疗效均比较明显,但是重建钢板内固定的不良反应较少,占据绝对优势. “,”Objective To analyze different effect of the fixed way in the application of clavicle fracture patients. Methods 200 cases of clavicle fracture patients are divided into four groups,each 50 cases,lines of reconstruction plate internal fixation group A,group B and the needle was line wire internal fixation,group C line,clavicular hook plate fixation group D lines of fixed screw through the clavicle and the coronoid process. Results In group A and group B,C,D group patients was respectively 94%,92%,96%,100%,there was no statistically significant difference comparing; Group A and group B,group C,D group of patients with adverse reaction rate of 0,16%,8% and 4% respectively,compare the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion The curative effect of four kinds of internal fixation treatment clavicular fracture are obvious,but the reconstruction plate internal fixation with less adverse reaction,occupy absolute advantage.