论文部分内容阅读
山东省枣庄市山亭区人民法院不久前审结一起追索葡萄园投资款一案,原告马某拿着先后有四位村主任签名的“同意赔偿葡萄园投资款一万元”的字据向法院起诉,原以为会稳操胜券,没想到却被判败诉。1986年,为响应镇政府推广种植葡萄的号召,原告与所在的村委会口头商定先由原告承包村里两亩土地种植葡萄,三年内不交承包金,三年后再定合同:当时由村里出面从农行贷款1000元作为扶持,原告也在葡萄地里作了相应的投入。1990年春,村里向原告催要1000元的农行贷款,遭到原告拒绝,理由是当时村里说的是无偿扶持、原告与村委会为此发生纠纷,双方的葡萄园合同因而流产,葡萄园也被荒芫,后
Not long ago, the people’s court of Shanting District, Zaozhuang City, Shandong Province, concluded a case of recourse to investment in vineyards. The plaintiff, Mamou, brought the letter of “compensation of 10,000 yuan for investment in vineyard” signed by four village chiefs to the court Prosecute, originally thought it would be safe, but did not expect but was sentenced to defeat. In 1986, in response to the town government’s call to popularize grapes, the plaintiffs and the village committee where they were responsible agreed verbally that the plaintiff contracted two acres of land in the village to grow the grapes. The grapes were not paid within three years and the contract was fixed after three years: Appeared from the Agricultural Bank of China loan of 1,000 yuan as support, the plaintiff also made a corresponding investment in the grapes. The spring of 1990, the village urged the plaintiff 1000 yuan Agricultural Bank of China was rejected by the plaintiff on the grounds that at that time the village said it was for free support, the plaintiff and the village committee for this dispute, the two sides contract the vineyard thus abortion, vineyard also Was wild yellow, after