论文部分内容阅读
大陆法系与英美法系学者在体育法教材编写上,存在着两种不同的写作模式:前者以成文规范为中心,重体系架构;后者则以松散的问题为中心,通过案例、判决辑要展开论述。我国体育法教科书是典型的大陆法模式,但有自身特色。体育法学的方法论基础是法教义学。尽管在晚近,社科法学向法教义学发出诘难,但后者仍然是且应当是体育法学的主流研究方法。在未来,体育法教材还可进一步优化体系结构,并拓展主体地位以及体育劳动法和民事体育法的内容。
Civil law and Anglo-American law scholars in sports law textbooks, there are two different modes of writing: the former with the norms of norms as the center and heavy system architecture; the latter is loosely centered questions, through the case, the verdict series To expand the discussion. Our country sports law textbook is a typical continental law model, but has its own characteristics. The methodology of sports law is based on legal teachings. Although social science jurisprudence recently issued a calamity to legal teachings, the latter is and should be the mainstream research method in sports law. In the future, the textbooks of sports law can further optimize the system structure and expand the subject status as well as the content of sports labor law and civil sports law.