论文部分内容阅读
在讨论《我的战友邱少云》一课主人公时,同学们争论得十分激烈。一部分同学认为这一课主人公应该是“我”,理由是文章用相当多的篇幅写了“我”在潜伏中所见、所思和所感;另一部分同学认为主人公应该是邱少云,理由是文题已经点明了。但说不出个更深的道理。第二种意见当然是正确的。但为什么会讲不出理由来呢?原因是同学们没有从当时所处的特殊环境和文章所采用的特殊手法来考虑。一般写人的课文,都抓住了主人公的外貌、服饰、动作、神态和语言等方面进行正面的描述。
When discussing the hero of “My comrade in arms Qiu Shaoyun”, the students argued very fiercely. Some of the classmates think that the main character of this class should be “me” on the grounds that the article wrote “I” in a considerable amount of space, what I saw and what I thought and felt in my potential. Another part of my classmates thought that the protagonist should be Qiu Shaoyun because of the topic Already point out. But can not say a deeper truth. The second opinion of course is correct. But why can not explain the reason? The reason is that students did not from the particular circumstances at the time and articles used to consider the special techniques. The general writing of the text, have captured the hero's appearance, costumes, movements, demeanor and language and other aspects of a positive description.