民事、行政、经济案件占所有审判案件的三分之二以上。对这些案件的错误裁判,法律设置了三种救济措施,一是当事人申请再审,当事人及其法定代理人对于法院已发生法律效力的判决、裁定,认为有错误的,要求法院重新审理。二是法院自己(包括原审法院和原审法院的上级法院)发现已生效的判决、裁定确有错误,重新审理。三是检查机关的监督,检察机关发现原判决、裁定认证事实的主要证据不足;或适用法律有错;或法院审理中违反法定程序,可能影响案件正确裁决;或审判人员在审理中有贪污受贿、徇私舞弊、枉法裁判行为的,依法向法院提出抗诉。显然,来自外部的检察机关的监督最具有约束力和救济 Civil, administrative and economic cases account for more than two thirds of all trial cases. For the wrong referee in these cases, the law sets three kinds of relief measures. First, the parties apply for retrial, and the parties and their legal representatives require the court to re-adjudicate the verdict and ruling that the court has legally effectual. Second, the court itself (including the higher court of the trial court and the court of first instance) found the verdict in force and ruled that there was a mistake and reopened it. Third, the supervision of the inspection authorities, prosecutors found the original verdict, ruled that the lack of evidence of the main evidence of certification; or applicable law is wrong; or court proceedings in violation of legal procedures may affect the correct ruling of the case; or trial of corruption in the trial of bribes , Favoritism and favoritism, act in vain to rule the law, according to the law to protest the court. Obviously, oversight by prosecutors from outside is the most binding and remedy