论文部分内容阅读
语境主义是目前解决怀疑主义难题最流行的策略之一,语境主义以语境的高低标准来划分知识的高低标准,非常圆融地回应了怀疑主义对知识的种种诘难,然而这种思路有其自身无法摆脱的缺陷,因为这种策略修正了知识论中“知识”与“知道”概念的内涵,导致“知识”与“知道”概念的相对化。针对语境主义的这种困境,新摩尔主义应运而生。与语境主义相比,新摩尔主义最独特的理论优势就在于:它采用一种不变论的立场来消除语境主义关于语境高低标准区分的困境。在这项工作中,普理查德和布莱克的成绩卓著,他们分别提出了各自的新摩尔主义策略。
Contextualism is one of the most popular tactics to solve the skepticism problem at present. Contextualism divides the level of knowledge by the level of the context, and responds very harmoniously to the skepticism of knowledge. However, this kind of thinking There is a flaw in itself that can not get rid because this strategy amends the connotation of the concept of “knowledge ” and “knowledge ” in epistemology, resulting in the relativity between the concepts of “knowledge” and “knowing”. In response to this dilemma of contextualism, neo-Moorishism emerged. Compared with the contextualism, the most unique theoretical advantage of Neo-Morocism is that it adopts a kind of invariant position to eliminate the dilemma of contextualism on the distinction between the levels of context. In this work, Prudchard and Blake made remarkable achievements, each proposing their own neo-Moorish tactics.