老子之《道德经》，哲理玄深，文辞亦“微妙难识”．因此，最早解释此经的韩非的《解老》，自然为历来学者所重视，据之解老亦颇多见．文章认为，韩解虽然有其参考价值，可是其解往往与本意乖异，故宜加辨别．对此，作者已有大阐述．本文则再引举明显之事例作进一步论述，以明此说非为诬妄． Lao Zi’s “moral classics”, philosophical profound, diction is also “subtle and difficult.” Therefore, the earliest interpretation of Han Fei’s “solution to old age” is of course always valued by scholars and the solution to old age is also quite common. The article believes that although the Korean solution has its reference value, but its solution is often different from the original meaning, it should be added to distinguish. In this regard, the author has made a big elaboration. This article will then introduce obvious cases for further discussion, in order to say that non-false accusations.