论文部分内容阅读
[案情]2004年3月8日,原告江苏正宇机电有限公司(以下简称正宇公司)和被告袁庆春签订承揽协议,约定由袁庆春将原告的一台正宇牌风暴农用车及随车配件,于同年3月9日8时前送至陕西咸阳市秦兴汽贸公司。当日,袁庆春从原告处将该车提出,办理了出库手续,但却未将农用车运送至原告指定的收货人处,而是误运送给了咸阳市富民农机商贸有限公司(以下简称富民公司)。后正宇公司因为袁庆春未将农用车运送给指定的收货人,遂以袁庆春为被告,将富民公司列为第三人,起诉请求法院判令袁庆春及富民公司返还其一台正宇牌风暴农用车或者折价赔偿。法院查明该车市场价格为51700元。
[Case] On March 8, 2004, the plaintiff, Jiangsu Zhengyu Electrical Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Zhengyu Company) and Yuan Qingchun, the defendant, signed the contractual agreement, which stipulated that Yuan Qingchun would have one of the plaintiff’s Zhengyu brand storm agricultural vehicles and on- In the same year, at 8 o’clock on the March 9 before sent to Shaanxi Xianyang Qin Qimao company. On the same day, Yuan Qingchun put forward the car from the plaintiff and handled the delivery formalities, but failed to deliver the farm car to the consignee designated by the plaintiff. Instead, it was mistakenly sent to Xianyang Fumin Agricultural Machinery Trading Company (hereinafter referred to as Fumin the company). After Zhengyu company because Yuan Qingchun did not transport the farm truck to the designated consignee, Yuan Qingchun defendant, the Fumin company as the third person, the prosecution of the court ordered Yuan Qingchun and Fumin to return a Zhengyu card storm Farm car or discount compensation. The court found the car market price of 51,700 yuan.