论文部分内容阅读
现藏故宫博物院的西晋永嘉二年(308年)石尠、石定墓志在民国八年(1919年)出土于河南洛阳城北郊。因为系盗掘出土,所以早期研究论著对这两方墓志出土时地的记载歧说纷纭,这一情况直接影响到学界对石氏墓志真伪和学术价值的判定。本文在梳理、辨析相关文献后,认为洛阳古董商郭玉堂的《洛阳出土石刻时地记》中通过田野调查所获得的石尠、石定墓志的出土时地信息最为可信。通过出土文献和传世文献互相释证,本文在考察建国前洛阳一带出土石刻的流散情况后,认为河南洛阳古代艺术馆收藏的所谓《石尠墓志》当系重刻本。石尠、石定墓志在出土后不久就被当时北平金石家周进收藏,民国二十六年(1937年)周进去世,这两方墓志连同其它汉晋石刻一并由其家属捐献给故宫博物院,一直收藏至今。
Now hidden in the National Palace Museum Yongjia two years (308 years) Shijie, Shi Ding epitaph in the Republic of China eight years (1919) unearthed in northern Luoyang City, Henan Province. Because the Department of excavation unearthed, so the early research treatises unearthed unearthed on both sides of the unearthed records divergent views, a situation that directly affects the academic community to determine the authenticity and academic value of the stone’s epitaph. After combing and discriminating the relevant documents, I think the most convincing information was obtained from the stone unearthed in the unearthed Shih Tomb from Luoyang antique dealer Guo Yutang’s “Luoyang unearthed stone inscription”. By unearthed documents and handed down documents mutual proof, this paper examines the distribution of stone unearthed in the area before the founding of the People’s Republic of China, that the so-called “Stone Epitaph” when Luoyang Ancient Art Museum collection of Henan Province is re-engraved. Shijie and Shih Dinh were collected by Zhou Peking Jinshi Zhou immediately after the unearthed. In the second year of the Republic of China (1937), Zhou Jin died. Together with other Han and Jin dynasties, their epitaphs were donated by the families to the Forbidden City Museum, has been collected so far.