一些考生在议论文中运用事实论据时,常犯的一个错误是对事例一举了之,简单地以事例代替说理。这样写出来的作文往往结论草率,缺乏说服力。正确的做法是,写议论文不仅要举事例,还应该对事例进行分析。如果分析不透彻,说理不充分,材料即使再多,也只不过是一堆没有骨架的肉,一地没有枝干的叶。因此,考生应该认识到,议论文质量的高低,除了论点的正确与否、论据的典型与否外,还要看分析是否全面、深刻、辩证。同样一个论点,所用的事例相同或相近,但由于分析深入程度不同,其说 Some candidates in the argumentative argument in the use of factual arguments, the common mistake is to give one example of the case, simply by case instead of reasoning. Compositions written in this way tend to lead to haphazard conclusions and lack of persuasion. The correct approach is to write an essay not only to give examples, but also to analyze the case. If the analysis is not thorough enough, the argument is not sufficient, even if the material is more, it is no more than a pile of skeleton meat, one without branch leaves. Therefore, candidates should recognize that the quality of argumentative essay, in addition to whether the argument is correct or not, the argument is typical or not, but also depends on whether the analysis is comprehensive, profound and dialectical. The same argument, the same or similar cases used, but due to the different levels of analysis, which said