论文部分内容阅读
原告起诉资格是开启环境公益诉讼大门的基本条件,当前,关于环境公益诉讼的理论主要有四种,即公共信托理论、环境权理论、私人检察长理论和诉讼信托理论,它们均在不同程度上能够适应现实需求;结合我国实际境况,针对不同的原告宜采用不同的理论作为支撑,其中,公共信托理论+监督穷尽适用于公民,公诉权扩张理论针对检察机关,公意提取理论针对环保社团组织。各不同主体作为原告,应该有相应的条件限制,公民须经过向环保行政管理机关和检察机关申请的前置程序,对检察机关起诉案件的类型和诉讼程序应有所限制,环保社团组织作为原告的条件较为宽松,环保行政机关无权提起环境公益诉讼,它只能帮助和支持相关主体起诉和诉讼。
At present, there are mainly four theories about environmental public interest litigation: public trust theory, environmental rights theory, private prosecutorial theory and litigation trust theory, all of which are to varying degrees According to the actual situation in our country, we should adopt different theories to support different plaintiffs. Among them, the theory of public trust + supervision is exhaustive for citizens, the expansion of public prosecution rights is aimed at procuratorial organs, . The different main bodies as the plaintiffs should have the corresponding conditions and restrictions. Citizens must go through the pre-application procedures applied to the environmental protection administrative authorities and the procuratorial organs. The procuratorial agencies should limit the types of prosecutions and litigation procedures. The environmental protection associations as the plaintiffs The conditions are more relaxed, environmental administration has no right to bring environmental public interest litigation, it can only help and support litigation and litigation related parties.