统计表明:某基层法院去年一年决定逮捕案件的数量,达到案件总数的25%以上,但最后真正判处有期徒刑的只占到法院决定逮捕案件数的32%,判处缓刑的竟然占到了法院决定逮捕案件数的10%,而其他的都是判处拘役,甚至还有1人免予刑事处罚。这些案件基本上都是故意伤害、交通肇事、危险驾驶等案件。主要是赔偿或罚金没有到位,法院将逮捕措施作为向被告人施加压力的一种手段,一旦赔偿或罚金到位或达到其他目的,即判处被告人缓刑。这就使得逮捕强制措施的严肃性降低和功能异化。 Statistics show that when a grass-roots court decided to arrest more than 25% of the total cases in a year last year, it only accounted for 32% of the total number of cases in which the court finally decided to arrest those sentenced to imprisonment. Arrest 10% of the cases, while others are sentenced to criminal detention, and even one person exempt from criminal penalties. These cases are basically intentional injuries, traffic accidents, dangerous driving and other cases. Mainly compensation or fines is not in place, the court will use the arrest measures as a means of exerting pressure on the defendant, once the compensation or fines in place or for other purposes, sentence the defendant suspended. This reduces the seriousness and alienation of arrest coercive measures.