论文部分内容阅读
作为“第二个十年”新文学史叙述的重要组成部分,新诗的文学史呈现以“进步”为基本逻辑展开。受知识、视野、观念等诸多因素制约,不同史家对新诗发展描述相互影响和借鉴,从而使新诗表现出叙述的类同性,当然也不尽相同。进步成为新诗叙述的逻辑前提,同样体现在文学史评价方面,评价的“进化焦虑”说明“进化”本身成为某种不言自明的公共话语。建立在个人感性认知基础上的新诗微观史还原了“进步”话语面临的困境,证明新诗史是叙事学编码的想象结果。
As an important part of the narration of the new literary history of “the Second Decade,” the literary history of the new poem presents the basic logic of “progress”. Constrained by knowledge, vision, ideas and many other factors, different historians describe the interaction between the development of new poems and learn from each other, so that the new poetry shows narration of the same sex, of course, not the same. Progress is the logical premise of the narration of new poetry, which is also reflected in the evaluation of literary history. The evaluation of “evolutionary anxiety” states that “evolution” itself becomes some self-evident public discourse. The micro-history of new poetry based on personal perceptual cognition restores the predicament of the “progressive” discourse and proves that the history of new poetry is the imagination of narrative codes.