论文部分内容阅读
关于阿瑟·密勒,《美国最优秀剧选》的编者约翰·加斯纳认为是和田纳西·威廉士并驾齐驱的剧作家。剧评家理·瓦特则认为,他们俩加上威廉·英兹,是继龙金·奥尼尔以后的三位严肃剧大师,无疑会在世界剧作家的光荣榜上永远留名。这是五十年代的评价。到了六十年代末,另一个《剧选》编者巴恩斯沙为他的《代价》仍是该年代最优秀剧之一,但他的成就将无法驾乎爱德华·阿尔比之上,在某个意义上其历史地位可能还比不上尼·西门。
With regard to Arthur Miller, John Gasner, editor of America’s Best Dramas, is considered the playwright to keep pace with Tennessee Williams. Critics Richard Watt believes that the two of them together with William Yingzi, following the Long King O’Neill later three serious dramatist, will undoubtedly be in the world playwright’s Hall of Fame forever named. This is the evaluation of the fifties. By the late 1960s, Barnes Shah, another editor of the “Playwright,” was still one of the best plays of his time for him, but his achievements would not be able to reach Edwards Alby, In a sense its historical status may not be as good as Neos Simon.