论文部分内容阅读
几乎在同一时间,两本有关艺术的学术刊物在国内面世。以公开发行的期刊为平台,开展对当代艺术的研究和评论,这样的实践尽管一直在艺术生态中处于薄弱的环节,但却从没间断过。对于期刊的要求,国内艺术圈曾经只强调是否独立,是否对不同的艺术实践有足够多元的信息传递。当然,同时一些刊物也会强调与主流艺术观念的差异。这两本刊物的出现,既可视为标示艺术期刊出版的更高要求,也更表露出艺术史学家和评论家对当前艺术环境中所存在问题的焦虑。
Almost at the same time, two academic journals on art were made in China. Using published periodicals as a platform to conduct research and commentary on contemporary art, such practice has not ceased, despite being a weak link in the art ecosystem. For the requirements of periodicals, the art circles in the country have only emphasized whether they are independent or whether they have enough pluralistic information to convey different artistic practices. Of course, at the same time, some publications will also emphasize the differences with the mainstream artistic concepts. The appearance of these two journals can be regarded as a higher requirement for marking the publication of art journals and also shows the anxiety of art historians and critics over the existing problems in the art environment.