甲骨金文有“■”字,原文作■、■、■、■等形,其考釋是古文字學界長期争論的一個問題。由於最近公布的清華大學藏戰國竹簡中也有此字,再次引起學者們的討論。我在考釋古文字中用作“察”、“淺”、“竊”和“翦”等的“剗”字時,曾認爲此字應釋爲“截”。~([1])現在把這個意見寫出來,供大家參考。需要說明的是,黄盛璋先生已把甲骨金文“■”釋爲“截”字初文,~([2])本文只是對黄先生意見的補充。 Oracle has “■ ” word, the original for ■, ■, ■, ■ and other forms, the textual interpretation of the ancient writing is a long-standing debate of a problem. Due to the recently released Tsinghua University bamboo slips of the Warring States also have this word once again aroused the discussion of scholars. When I used the words “” in “”, “”, “” and “翦” in the test of ancient writing, I thought it should be interpreted as “ cut”. ~ ([1]) Now write down this opinion for your reference. It should be noted that Mr. Huang Shengzhang has translated the Oracle text “” into “cut-off”, which is just a supplement to Mr. Huang’s comment.