关于编辑的学问,是应该把它视作一门既有理论、又有实践的学科而命名为编辑学呢,还是应该把它视作指导操作的方法而命名为编辑法或编辑工艺学,这一问题,通过近几年来的研究和讨论,已经在出版界、学术界形成了一致的意见:应以前一种方式看待和命名。编辑工作“有术无学”的传统误解,已经得到彻底的澄清。但是,编辑学要成为货真价实的学科,光靠“宣言”是不够的,还须建立自己的理论体系,才能真正站稳脚跟。“一步行动,胜于一打纲领”的名言,在这里也是适用的。编辑学要真正成为一门学科,必须同任 Is it necessary to regard editorial learning as editorialism as a theoretical and practical discipline, or as editing method or editing technol- ogy as a method of instructional operation? One issue, through research and discussion in recent years, has been the unanimous consensus among the press and academia that it should be viewed and named in the former way. The traditional misunderstanding of the editorial work “There is no learning without learning” has been thoroughly clarified. However, it is not enough to rely solely on the “declaration” to edit science to become a genuine discipline, and we must establish our own theoretical system so that we can really gain a firm foothold. It is also applicable here for the saying that “one step is better than a dozen programs.” Editing studies really become a subject, must be the same