论文部分内容阅读
《人民法院组织法》第10条规定;人民法院审判案件,实行合议制。除一审部分简单民事案件、轻微刑事案件和法律另有规定的案件外,其余都由合议庭进行审判。在第11条中又规定了审判委员会任务之一是讨论重大的或者疑难的案件。合议庭与审判委员会是什么关系,合议庭对具体案件的处理意见与审判委员会不一致时该怎么判决,《人民法院组织法》中没有说明。只有在《刑事诉讼法》和《民事诉讼法(试行)》“审判组织”这一章中作了规定,即“审判委员会的决定,合议庭应当(必须)执行”。审判实践中都是根据这个规定,按照审判委员会多数人的
Article 10 of the Organic Law of the People’s Court stipulates that the people’s court shall try the case and implement a collegial system. Except for cases of simple civil cases, minor criminal cases and laws stipulated in the first instance, the others are tried by a collegial panel. In article 11, it was also stipulated that one of the tasks of the judicial committee was to discuss major or difficult cases. What is the relationship between the collegial panel and the adjudication committee? What should the court decide when the collegial panel’s handling of specific cases is inconsistent with that of the judicial committee? There is no explanation in the Organic Law of the People’s Court. Only in the “Criminal Procedure Law” and the “Code of Civil Procedure (Trial)” “Judicial Organization” this chapter provides that “the decision of the judicial committee, the collegiate bench should be (must) perform.” Judicial practice is based on this provision, according to the majority of the Judicial Committee