论文部分内容阅读
我国《著作权法》及《著作权法实施条例》对建筑作品的狭义解释受到了相关领域学者的质疑,认为应该将建筑作品的内涵作扩大解释才合理,相应的论述也基本上是从法学知识产权的角度出发,以《伯尔尼公约》及相关国内外《著作权法》为依据,用纯理论角度去探析建筑作品的内涵,但忽略了一个问题,因建筑作品有着其实用特殊性,所以对建筑作品的该问题探讨应当是处于一种交叉学科的视角,因此从建筑的流程作为切入点再结合以往知识产权条约架构或将能清楚认识建筑作品的内涵问题。
The narrow interpretation of architectural works in China’s Copyright Law and the Regulations for the Implementation of the Copyright Law has been questioned by scholars in relevant fields. It is reasonable to expand the connotation of the architectural works, and the corresponding discussion is basically from the legal intellectual property Based on the “Berne Convention” and the related “Copyright Law” at home and abroad, this paper analyzes the connotation of architectural works from a purely theoretical perspective, but ignores a problem. Because architectural works have their own particularity and particularity, This issue should be discussed in an interdisciplinary perspective. Therefore, from the point of view of the construction process as an entry point, the issue of the connotation of architectural works can be clearly identified by combining with the previous treaty framework of intellectual property.