当财产权在宪法意义上被提及的时候,它更多的意味着某种主体的资格,折射着义务本位向权利追求的转变。财产权在宪法基本要素中的地位也经历了从平行到超越,在与公权力博弈的过程中最终回归理性的过程,其实践价值是毋庸置疑的。然而,我们在对财产权进行合理限制的同时,应当侧重于从有限性角度去考量公共利益的维度。 When property rights are mentioned in the constitutional sense, it more means the qualifications of certain subjects, which reflect the transformation of obligation-based to the pursuit of rights. The status of property rights in the basic elements of the constitution has also undergone a process of finally returning to rationality from parallelism to transcendence and in the process of game with public power. Its practical value is undoubted. However, while we rationally restrict the property rights, we should focus on the dimension of considering the public interest from a limited perspective.