大陆法系和英美法系中的法律创造、法律解释风格是迥然不同的。在大陆法系国家,法官只是个法律解释者;英美法系国家,法官就是立法者,有时候甚至还需要裁判政治案件。因而,两种法系下法律人才的培养模式便也不同。所谓“法律人”和“法匠”的区分,不是职业品德的贵贱优劣的问题,而只是因具体语境而要求不同罢了。最重要的是,法律人才要能够承担得起解释规范与输送正义的功能。我国是大陆法系传统国家,应该培养法学工匠。 Civil law and Anglo-American law in the legal creation, legal interpretation of the style is very different. In civil law countries, the judge is only a legal interpreter; common law countries, judges are legislators, and sometimes even need to referendum political cases. Therefore, under the two legal systems, legal personnel training mode will be different. The distinction between the so-called “legal person” and the “lawmaker” is not a matter of inferiority or inferiority of professional morality, but only because of different contexts. Most importantly, legal professionals should be able to afford the functions of explaining norms and delivering justice. China is a traditional country in the civil law system and should train legal craftsmen.