论文部分内容阅读
准实在论采取投射主义、表达主义的反实在论立场,同时又辩护对按投射主义理解的判断作出真假评价的权利,而解释真理概念成为这个任务的逻辑基础。准实在论提出过语义学解释、语用学解释和语源学解释三种解释,不仅没有给出准确的真理意义,而且导致了诸多问题。准实在论的真理难题启示我们,真理词项的处理要区分日常领域与各专业领域;对于具有客观性内涵的真理概念,应采取实在论去理解它所评价的判断。
Quasi-realism adopts the anti-realist standpoint of projectionism and expressionism while defended the right to make true and false evaluations of the judgments based on the understanding of projectionism. The interpretation of the concept of truth has become the logical foundation of this task. Quasi-realism puts forward three kinds of explanations: semantic interpretation, pragmatic interpretation and etymological interpretation, not only fail to give accurate truth meaning, but also cause many problems. The pragmatic truths of truth challenge us that the treatment of truth terms should differentiate between everyday fields and specialized fields. For the concept of truth with objective connotation, we should adopt realism to understand the judgments it evaluates.