论文部分内容阅读
俄亥俄大学教授霍利斯·陈博士被指控剽窃事(见《自然杂志》1986年324期198页)出现了新的转折。莫斯科的周刊《文学报》指控陈在其所编教科书《电磁波原理》中抄袭了白俄罗斯科学院一成员的两部著作。这篇抨击性文章的署名者是白俄罗斯科学院院长米科拉伊·巴理什维克和曾三次荣获国家奖的巴里斯·查帕诺博士。陈的辩护是:他从未读过那两部著作,他不懂俄语,而且,不管怎么说,他编写的是大学教材而不是学术专著。他说他没有声称该教材是自己的独创之作,对于该教科书护封上的简介中所提到的该问题是首次用“无
Hollis Chan, a professor at Ohio University, was accused of plagiarism (see Nature 324, 1984. 198) for a new turning point. Moscow’s weekly The Literary Journal accused Chen of plagiarizing two books by a member of the Belarussian Academy of Sciences in his textbook Electromagnetic Wave. The laudatory article was signed by Mikolaj Barushchik, president of the Belarussian Academy of Sciences, and Dr. Barris Chaparno, who won three national awards. Chen’s defense was that he had never read those two books, that he did not understand Russian, and that, in any case, he wrote college textbooks instead of academic monographs. He said he did not claim that the textbook was his own original work and that the issue mentioned in the introduction to the textbook cover was the first to use "