论文部分内容阅读
《文化纵横》:自1998年《村民委员会组织法》颁布以后,乡村治理进入了以村民直接选举为主的自治实践阶段。从某种意义上说,这意味着政府和党的领导在乡村治理过程中应该逐渐退出,而让更多的农民习惯民主的养成与自我的治理。但雁塔区在十年实践中,一整套概念和做法都是党组织作为主体以积极推进的方式进入乡村社会。您怎么看待这种反差?王军:民主和法治是一个不可逆转的趋势,这是共识。但是不论是学界还是执政者,大部分的注意力放在了民主程序研究上,对乡村民主过程中产生的实际问题缺少切实关注和有效应对,忽视了中国乡村本土的特殊性和复杂性。
“Cultural aspect”: Since the promulgation of the Organic Law of Villagers’ Committees in 1998, rural governance has entered an autonomous practice stage characterized by the direct election of villagers. In a sense, this means that the leadership of the government and the party should gradually be phased out in the process of rural governance and more peasants should be accustomed to the development of democracy and self-governance. However, in the ten-year practice of Yanta district, a whole set of concepts and practices have been adopted by the party organizations as the main body to enter rural communities in a proactive manner. What do you think of this contrast? Wang Jun: Democracy and the rule of law are an irreversible trend. This is a consensus. However, no matter academics or rulers, most attention has been paid to the study of democratic procedures, which lacks practical attention and effective response to the practical problems arising in the process of rural democracy, ignoring the particularity and complexity of Chinese rural areas.