论文部分内容阅读
目的比较极低出生体质量儿间隙缓慢滴注鼻饲喂养和连续鼻饲喂养的临床效果。方法选择本院NICU的极低出生体质量儿90例,随机分成间隙缓慢滴注鼻饲喂养组(A组)和连续鼻饲喂养组(B组),均同时予以非营养性吸吮和部分胃肠外营养,直至达到完全胃肠内喂养。比较2组患儿喂养不耐受性、达到完全胃肠内喂养时间、恢复出生体质量时间及平均住院日。结果间隙缓慢滴注鼻饲喂养组较连续鼻饲喂养组出现喂养不耐受数的例数少(P<0.05),且达到完全胃肠道喂养时间短(P<0.05)。结论极低出生体质量儿更耐受间隙缓慢滴注鼻饲喂养,其达到完全胃肠喂养时间更短。
Objective To compare the clinical effect of feeding nascent feeding and continuous nasogastric feeding with very low birth weight infants. Methods Ninety children with very low birth weight of NICU in our hospital were randomly divided into intermittent feeding group (group A) and continuous nasal feeding group (group B), both of which were given non-nutritive sucking and partial parenteral Nutrition until complete gastrointestinal feeding. Infertility was compared between the two groups, reaching complete gastrointestinal feeding, restoring birth weight and average length of stay. The results showed that there was a small number of cases of feeding intolerance (P <0.05), and the time of complete gastrointestinal feeding was shorter (P <0.05) than that of the continuous nasal feeding group. Conclusions Very low birth weight children are more tolerant of slow gavage nasal feeding, which leads to shorter total gastrointestinal feeding time.