论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨宫颈微波术与宫颈电环切除术治疗慢性宫颈炎的临床疗效及安全性。方法:将100例慢性宫颈炎患者随机分为观察组和对照组各50例,对照组给予微波治疗,观察组给予LEEP治疗,观察2组患者临床疗效及并发症情况。结果:观察组的治愈率明显高于对照组(P<0.05),对照组术后并发症发生率明显高于观察组(P<0.05)。结论:微波治疗和LEEP均适合治疗宫颈糜烂患者,LEEP效果比较好一些。
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of cervical microwave and cervicocelectomy in the treatment of chronic cervicitis. Methods: 100 cases of chronic cervicitis were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 50 cases in each group. The control group was treated with microwave. The observation group was given LEEP treatment. The clinical curative effect and complications of the two groups were observed. Results: The cure rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P <0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the control group was significantly higher than that in the observation group (P <0.05). Conclusion: Both microwave and LEEP are suitable for treatment of patients with cervical erosion, LEEP effect is better.