“可以”一词在《刑事诉讼法》使用多达133次,其功能主要用于表示对公安司法机关的授权。由于“可以”一词本身语义的模糊性,致使实践中对相关包含“可以”一词的法条文本在解释时发生争议,存在着对“可以”一词的“误解”与“误用”的情形。在公安司法机关掌握着法律解释权力的实践中,文本的解释为“权力”服务的倾向交不可避免。 The term “may ” is used up to 133 times in the Code of Criminal Procedure and its function is mainly used to indicate the authorization of the public security judiciary. Due to the fuzziness of the semantic meaning of the word “may ”, the practice involved the controversy over the interpretation of the relevant legal texts containing the word “may Misunderstanding ”and“ misuse ”situation. In the practice of public security and judicial organs holding the power of legal interpretation, the interpretation of the text is that the “power” service tends to be inevitable.