在实践中将某项民间习惯导入司法,必须经过合法性检验。从逻辑上推理,习惯的合法性检验结果无非具有如下两种可能:第一,该项习惯合乎现行法律规定,也不与当下的法律精神和法律政策冲突;第二,该项习惯具有正当性,但是不合制定法的规定或者与国家政策不符。前一种情况很好处理;后一种情况则比较复杂:如果严格按照法律规范操作,那么结果也是很清晰的,法官完全可以拒绝适用该习惯;但是, In practice, the introduction of a folk custom into the judiciary must be legally tested. Judging from logic, the result of the test of legitimacy of the habit is nothing more than the following two possibilities: First, the habit is in conformity with the existing laws and regulations and does not conflict with the current legal spirit and legal policies; secondly, the habit is justified , But the non-statutory provisions or inconsistent with the national policy. The former situation is well handled; the latter situation is more complicated: the results are very clear if strictly followed by legal norms and the judge can refuse to apply the habit; however,