论文部分内容阅读
在冲突管理的视角下,公共决策咨询机构成为调解制定决策中不同利益群体间利益冲突的第三方干预。一项政策的决策不可能满足社会中所有利益群体的利益,这时就需要出现一个客观的、独立的和具有科学分析能力的权威调解人出现,调解利益群体间的冲突,帮助决策者作出最终决策,实现最大可能的利益。但就目前我国的公共决策咨询机构来讲,还存在着许多缺陷,为了使决策更加科学化民主化,我们还要从法律等方面加强对公共决策咨询的支持,促使公共决策咨询的发展,使其能更好地服务于决策。
From the perspective of conflict management, public decision-making advisory bodies become third-party interventions in the conflict of interest among different interest groups in making decisions. When a policy decision can not meet the interests of all interest groups in society, an objective, independent and scientific analytical authority mediator needs to emerge to mediate the conflicts among interest groups and help the decision makers to make the final decision Make decisions to maximize your benefits. However, at present, there are still many shortcomings in our country’s public decision-making advisory body. In order to make the decision-making more scientific and democratic, we also need to strengthen the support for public decision-making consulting from the aspects of law and so on, and promote the development of public decision-making consultation. It better serve decision-making.