我国刑事判决书的量刑说理滞后于量刑规范化改革,过于简洁且不规范,影响判决的可接受性和判决公信力的树立。量刑说理要规范和透彻,要能够让人们在判决书中看得到量刑所经历的“法定刑—量刑起点—基准刑—调节基准刑—宣告刑”的思维过程,关于量刑情节的适用,要让人们读得到:某事由为何被选取作为量刑情节?有几个量刑情节、分别是什么,其功能是如何选择的?量刑情节影响基准刑的比例为多少? The sentencing theory of criminal judgments in our country lags behind the standardized reform of sentencing, which is too simple and not standardized to affect the acceptability of judgments and establish the credibility of judgments. Sentencing theory to be standardized and thorough, we must be able to allow people to see in the sentencing sentencing experienced by the “legal punishment - the starting point of sentencing - the base penalty - the adjustment of the standard punishment - sentence” the application of the sentencing circumstances, to Let people read: Why was it selected as the sentencing circumstances? There are several sentencing circumstances, respectively, what is the function of how to choose? Sentencing plot affect the proportion of the benchmark for how many?