论文部分内容阅读
本文通过分析Steele对二语音节划分的研究,揭示了中介语音系学面临的方法论困境,指出Steele采取的“完全迁移+普遍语法”的立场从方法论来说是弱假设,并提出了中介语音系学的“激进的中间道路”(RM)作为改进中介语音系学方法论的一种尝试。RM认为,普遍语法实际上是对理论的普遍性的极端追求,中介语音系的原则参数理论不需要诉诸于Chomsky所定义的那种独立于具体语言的普遍语法,从而极大约束了中介语音系学的假设空间。另外,本文在RM框架下讨论了中介语音系的有限性的问题,并提出了中介语音系的羡余性假设以及相应的中介语音系习得的阶段性假设和习得顺序假设。
By analyzing Steele’s research on the division of second syllables, this dissertation reveals the methodology dilemma confronting Intermediary Phonology and points out that Steele’s position of “Full Migration + Universal Grammar” is a weak assumption from the methodology and proposes an intermediary Phonology’s “Radical Middle Way” (RM) as an attempt to improve the methodology of Intermediary Phonology. RM believes that universal grammar is actually an extreme pursuit of the universality of the theory. The principle parameter theory of intercultural phonology does not need to resort to the universal grammar that is independent of a specific language as defined by Chomsky, thus greatly restricting the intercom voice Department of hypothesis space. In addition, this paper discusses the limitations of the intercommunication phonetic system under the framework of RM, and proposes the congeniality hypothesis of the intermediate phonology and the assumptions of the phased hypothesis and acquisition order of the corresponding interlanguage phonology.