论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察比较酶联免疫法(ELISA)和胶体金快速检测板(EICA)检测乙型肝炎两对半的结果。方法:选取江门市新会区罗坑镇中心卫生院2016年1月至2016年12月共300例检测乙型肝炎两对半的患者作为研究对象,分为ELISA组和EICA组,对比两种检测方法的结果。结果:EICA组检测结果和ELISA组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:胶体金快速检测板和酶联免疫法对乙型肝炎两对半检测准确率基本一致,而胶体金快速检测板操作更加简便,无需专业设备,能对单个标准迅速检测,临床在检测时要结合实际情况选择适当的检测方法。
Objective: To observe the results of two-and-a-half tests of Hepatitis B by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and colloidal gold rapid detection plate (EICA). Methods: From January 2016 to December 2016, a total of 300 cases of hepatitis B patients with two-and-a-half pairs of hepatitis B were selected as study subjects in Luo Kengzhen Central Hospital, Xinhui District, Jiangmen City. The patients were divided into ELISA group and EICA group. Test results of the method. Results: There was no significant difference between EICA group and ELISA group (P> 0.05). Conclusion: The colloidal gold rapid detection plate and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay are almost identical to the two-half detection accuracy of hepatitis B, while the colloidal gold rapid detection plate operation is more simple, without professional equipment, rapid detection of a single standard, clinical testing To combine the actual situation to choose the appropriate detection methods.