论文部分内容阅读
该研究旨在比较慢性阻塞性呼吸道疾病(COAD)所致急性换气衰竭时传统治疗和传统治疗加经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)治疗的疗效。 对象与方法 60例COAD急性发作,年龄不大于80岁,动脉血PaO_2<7.5kPa、PaCO_2>6kPa的患者。随机分为二组:传统治疗组(对照组)和传统治疗加NIPPV组(NIPPV组)各30例。传统治疗包括吸氧、给药及理疗。NIPPV组患者入院后尽快应用硅制面罩吸入流量是1～2L/min的氧进行NIPPV,鼓励患者每天
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of conventional and traditional therapies plus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in the treatment of acute ventilatory failure due to chronic obstructive airway disease (COAD). Subjects and methods 60 cases of COAD acute attack, the age of not more than 80 years old, arterial blood PaO_2 <7.5kPa, PaCO_2> 6kPa patients. Randomly divided into two groups: the traditional treatment group (control group) and the traditional treatment plus NIPPV group (NIPPV group) of 30 cases. Traditional treatments include oxygen, administration and physiotherapy. NIPPV patients were admitted to the hospital as soon as possible using silicon mask inhalation flow is 1 ~ 2L / min of oxygen for NIPPV, encourage patients every day