论文部分内容阅读
1989年12月14日到16日在上海举行了一次“中国债学探讨会”。我赞成债学这个学科的名称。我积极主张在我国开展债学的研究。我对这个会议的召开表示关心和支持。然而我未能应邀出席会议,只是提交了一篇题为《债学、信学和责任学》的论文,对债学和她的姊妹科学信学以及广义的债学——责任学讲了一点看法。临近会议开幕的时候又写了一个书面发言《我国债学研究的新起点》,专就狭义的债学,即经济债学的历史和它在我国的发展的前景又讲了一点看法。现在我就以《开拓我国债学的研究》为题,再谈谈这个问题。
From December 14 to December 16, 1989, a Seminar on China's Debt Seminar was held in Shanghai. I agree with the name of this discipline. I actively advocate the study of debt in our country. I express my concern and support for the convening of this meeting. However, I was not invited to attend the meeting, but I submitted an essay entitled “Debt, Letter and Responsibility Studies”, a little bit about debt and her sister sciences, as well as the broad sense of debt-accountability view. Near the opening of the conference, he wrote a written statement entitled “A New Starting Point for the Study of China's Debt Study.” He also made a brief comment on the narrow definition of debt, the history of economic debts and the prospects for its development in our country. Now I will take the topic of “Developing the Study of China's Debt Education” as a topic to talk about.