论文部分内容阅读
1998年10月,家住枣庄市的刘佳在该市服装批发市场买断59、60号摊位,并以其名办理了相应的经营手续。另一叫李春兰的与刘佳合伙承租了两个摊位,刘佳使用59号,李春兰使用60号,但没有书面手续。在经营中刘佳与李春兰发生矛盾,李春兰在别人介绍下以11000元将摊位转让给了张素。不久,张素与刘佳发生矛盾,刘佳遂将两个摊位转让给第三人葛绍良。葛绍良要求张素让出摊位,各方矛盾顿时激化。诉至法院,李春兰称,自己与被上诉人刘佳共同出资买断59、60号摊位,各自承担了一半费用,所以上诉人有权将60号摊位转让给张素,请求法庭确认与张素的转让关系有效。
In October 1998, Liu Jia, who lives in Zaozhuang City, bought booths 59 and 60 in the clothing wholesale market of the city and handled the corresponding business procedures in his name. Another called Li Chunlan and Liu Jia leased two stalls, Liu Jia 59, Li Chunlan 60, but without written procedures. In the management of Liu and Li Chunlan conflict, introduced by others Li Chunlan to 11,000 yuan will be assigned to the booth Zhang Su. Soon, Zhang Su and Liu Jia contradictions, Liu Jia then transfer the two stalls to a third person Ge Shaoliang. Ge Shaoliang asked Zhang Su to give up his booth, all parties suddenly intensified the conflict. Litigation to the court, Li Chunlan said he and the appellee Liu Jia co-financed to buy 59,60 stalls, each bearing half the cost, so the appellant has the right to 60 stalls assigned to Zhang Su, requesting the court to confirm and Zhang Su The transfer relationship is valid.