论文部分内容阅读
刑事追缴是一种非刑罚处置措施,能够挽回被害人和国家的损失,在刑事诉讼中居于极为重要的地位。我国当前刑事追缴制度还存在一些不足,导致实践中出现一些混乱,不利于刑事追缴工作的开展,也不利于相关主体的权利保护,主要表现为刑事追缴执行主体不明确、当事人参与权保障不足、缺席审判制度缺失。本文建议我国立法上明确刑事追缴的主体,保障当事人的参与权,且通过构建有限的缺席审判制度实现刑事追缴制度的完善。
Criminal recovery is a kind of non-punitive measures, which can restore the victims and the loss of the state and play an extremely important role in criminal proceedings. The current system of criminal recovery in our country still has some shortcomings, leading to some confusion in practice, not conducive to carry out the work of criminal recovery, is not conducive to the protection of the rights of the relevant subjects, mainly manifested as the subject of criminal recovery is not clear, the parties involved in the protection of inadequate protection, Absence of trial system is missing. This paper suggests that China’s legislation clarify the subject of criminal recovery, protect the parties’ right to participate, and improve the system of criminal recovery through constructing a limited system of absence trial.