论文部分内容阅读
对盆景作品的鉴赏及其艺术水平高低的评判,是有客观标准的。但在艺术欣赏的实践中,对同一个作品,往往会有不同的评价,甚至出现截然相反看法的现象,也经常发生,这是不足为怪的。这里选载了一组对某个作品持有不同见解的短文,都是一家之言,不代表编辑部的观点。我们之所以发表,目的在于贯彻“双百”方针,交流各自的体会,切磋技艺,在共同的探讨中,提高制作水平和鉴赏能力。欢迎有兴趣的读者对本刊选登的不管是谁的作品(盆景或根艺),进行具体的分析评述,这对于作者、读者和编者都将有一定的启发意义。来稿不要超过千字为宜。
Appreciation of the works of bonsai and the level of their artistic judgment, there is an objective standard. However, in the practice of artistic appreciation, it is not surprising that the same piece of work often has different evaluations and even appearances of opposite opinions. There is a selection of essays that hold different opinions about a particular work. They are all statements made by one and do not represent the editorial board’s point of view. The reason why we publish is to carry out the “double hundred” principle, to exchange our own experiences, to learn skills, and to improve the production level and appreciation ability in a common discussion. Interested readers are welcome to make a specific analysis and comment on the selected editors (bonsai or root art), which will be of some inspiration to authors, readers and editors. Contributions should not exceed a thousand words is appropriate.