论文部分内容阅读
目的：观察对比鱼腥草与先锋Ｖ对小儿肺炎的临床疗效。方法：依据就诊顺序选取无严重并发症的４４例小儿肺炎患儿进行分组。治疗组采用鱼腥草注射液；共２６例。对照组采用先锋Ｖ注射液，共１８例。两组年龄，性别无显著性差异。结果：二者总有效率相近，治疗组为９６．１％，对照组为９４．４％。治疗组平均退热天数、平均罗音消失天数，平均止咳祛疾天数、平均平喘天数、平均住院天数分别为２．８天，５．０２天，４．４天，１．９４天，９．２天。对照组分别为３．１天，５．１天，５．２天，２．０天，９．５天。结论：鱼腥草注射液与先锋Ｖ注射液有相似的疗效，鱼腥草注射液在解热，止咳化痰方面优于先锋Ｖ注射液，在平喘、肺部罗音消失天数及住院天数上与先锋Ｖ注射液无显著性差异。
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of Houttuynia cordata and Vanguard V in children with pneumonia. Methods: A total of 44 cases of children with pneumonia were selected according to the order of treatment without serious complications. Treatment group Houttuynia injection; a total of 26 cases. Control group Pioneer V injection, a total of 18 cases. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age and sex. Results: The total effective rate was similar, the treatment group was 96.1%, the control group was 94.4%. The mean days of fever relief, the average number of days of rales disappearing, the average days of cough and asthma extinction, the average days of asthma relief and the average hospitalization days were 2.8 days, 5.02 days, 4.4 days, 1.94 days and 9 days respectively .2 days. Control groups were 3.1 days, 5.1 days, 5.2 days, 2.0 days, 9.5 days. Conclusion: Houttuynia injection and vanguard V injection have similar curative effect. Houttuynia injection is superior to Vanguard V injection in antipyretic and cough-reducing phlegm, There was no significant difference between vanguard V injection.