笔者有一位同事,五十多岁,勤奋认真,严谨负责,教学成绩一直优秀,之前遇上一次职称聘任的机会,因为种种复杂的原因,不能按聘任的正常程序走,领导决定让全体老师以投票的方式来决定是聘还是不聘。结果老师们的意见分成了泾渭分明的两派:一种是主张聘任,三十几年的工作时间,兢兢业业地付出,应该体恤和尊重老教师,要体现人性的温暖与关怀;另一种是主张不聘任,该老师工作量少,“量化考核”的成绩低,达不到聘任的标准,按照制度和程序走, I have a colleague in his fifties, diligent, serious and responsible, teaching excellence has been excellent, before the appointment of a job title opportunities, because of all sorts of complex reasons, can not be appointed by the normal procedures go, the leadership decided to let all teachers Voting will decide whether to hire or not. Results The teachers’ opinions are divided into two distinct groups: one is that they are employed and the working time is thirty years, and they are conscientiously and professionally paid. They should sympathize with and respect the old teachers and embody the warmth and care of human nature. The other is to advocate No appointment, the teacher less workload, “quantitative assessment ” low grade, less than the standard appointment, in accordance with the system and procedures go,