论文部分内容阅读
在语言哲学中,名称问题是其核心问题之一。在此问题上荀子从命名的初始角度提出了“名无固宜”和“名无固实”的观点;从名称的使用角度荀子提出“名有固善”的观点。克里普克和普特南的因果历史命名理论认为命名仪式是名称作为固定指示词必然地指称某个特定对象,并提出了实指和用摹状词来固定指称的两种命名途径。对这两种观点进行比较,得出两者的融合是名称理论的必然趋势。
In language philosophy, the issue of name is one of the core issues. On this issue, Xunzi proposed the viewpoints of “name without solid” and “name without solid” from the initial naming point of view. From the perspective of the use of the name, Xunzi proposed the view that “name has solidarity”. Kripke and Putnam’s causal historical naming theory holds that a naming ceremony is a name that invariably refers to a particular object as a fixed indicator and proposes two ways of naming the actual finger and the fixed reference finger. Comparing these two points of view, it is concluded that the fusion of the two is the inevitable trend of the theory of names.