对当前关于青春期领域的文献进行考察的结果表明,作者们都企图各自提出一种青春期发展模式(例如,科菲尔德等人,1986;维奥拉托与霍尔登,1988)。然而,遗憾的是,这些模式缺乏一种坚实的理论基础。就有关理论而言,社会科学家们仍然是从我(科尔曼,1978)所称为的“经典”理论中摄取养份,即他们的理论要么是起源于精神分析学或社会学,要么是将他们的研究局限在“人生发展理论”当中。在本文中我想简要地考察一下“经 The results of the current literature on adolescence show that the authors are all trying to propose a pattern of adolescent development (eg, Koffield et al., 1986; Vioo and Holden, 1988). Unfortunately, however, these models lack a solid theoretical basis. In terms of theory, social scientists still derive their nutrients from the “classical” theory I called (Coleman, 1978) that their theory either originated in psychoanalysis or sociology or was Their study is limited to “life development theory”. In this article I want to briefly examine the "classics