论文部分内容阅读
为了冲破个体间的障碍,就需要法律解释来达到一种想象的重构,但是这是个浪漫的想法,是不可能达到的,所以要从具体社会来说明这个目标问题。在现在的大陆法系的理论中,通说认为法律解释的目标有主观说和客观说两种,除此之外,折衷说也占有一席之地。而且折衷说的“中庸之说”更能让我们所接受。在实践中也赞成折衷说的基本立场。
In order to break through the barriers between individuals, legal interpretation is needed to achieve a reconstruction of imagination. However, this is a romantic idea that can not be achieved. Therefore, we should explain this goal issue from a specific society. In the current theory of the continental law system, the general view holds that the objective of legal explanation is subjective and objective. In addition, the compromise also holds a place. And compromise that “doctrine of the mean ” more let us accept. In practice, we also agree with the basic position of compromise.