论文部分内容阅读
拙作《王维所访“香积寺”为“汝州风穴寺”考辨》发表后,遭到陕西师范大学王向辉先生的质疑,曰:“对诗歌元素僵化理解、对风穴寺历史文献有心误读、对王维人生行踪错误推定。”王先生言辞激烈,语言犀利,但文章中存在很多致命问题:一是对诗中元素的理解,大小环境不分,虚实不分,避重就轻,自相矛盾;二是对互相矛盾的历史典籍缺少基本的甄别就妄下结论;三是未加考证就妄断笔者“对历史文献有心误读”、“对王维行踪错误推定”。
After the publication of “Textual Research” of “Ruzhou Fengxue Temple”, he was questioned by Mr. Wang Xianghui of Shaanxi Normal University and said: “The rigid comprehension of the elements of poetry, There are many fatal issues in the history of the Fengxu Temple: ”Wang’s fierce rhetoric and sharp language, but there are many fatal issues in his essay. One is the comprehension of the elements in the poem, the size and environment, the actual situation Second, the contradictory history books lack basic screening to jump to the conclusion; Third, without reference to the author to arrogant author “on the history of the literature misleading ”, “Wang Wei Missing reasoning ”.