论文部分内容阅读
一、本刊“发展争鸣”栏目,开展对《04规则》中的附则3研讨以来,收到许多球友的来稿,广大球友发表了自己的真知灼见,提出了限制双杆球的很多方法,也有部分球友反对限制双杆球,提出了不同的见解。真是仁者见仁,智者见智,从正反两个方面探讨了限制双杆球的利与弊。本刊连续刊登了各方面的意见,基本上反映了广大球友对是否执行附则3的看法。这些好的建议,供各级门协领导在组织门球比赛时参考,已达到研讨的目的,今后本刊不再集中研讨.暂停刊登是否限制双杆球的意见。二、在制定《04规则》时,中国门协有关领导广泛
First, the magazine “development debate ” column, carried out on the “Rule 04” in the discussion of Annex 3, received a lot of ball man contributions, the majority of golfers published their own insights, put forward a lot of restrictions on double-rod Methods, there are some golfers who oppose the restriction of double-rod, put forward different views. Really benevolent see the benevolent, the wise see the wisdom, from both positive and negative aspects discussed the pros and cons of limiting double-rod. The magazine published a series of opinions in all aspects, basically reflecting the majority of golfers on the implementation of Annex 3 views. These good suggestions for the League leaders at all levels in the organization of the goalkeeper tournament has reached the purpose of the study, the future is no longer focused on this issue. Second, in the development of “04 rules”, China Door Association, a wide range of related leaders